Attendees & Representation
Type @ and your name to indicate your attendance
LF Staff:
Community:
| Name | Organisation | Present? |
|---|---|---|
| Cristina Santana Casillas (Chair) | Telefónica | x |
| Rafal Artych | DT | x |
| Sergio Francisco Ortiz | Telefónica | x |
| Ricardo Serrano Gutierrez | Telefónica | x |
| Jhon Javier Lozal Luco | Telefónica | x |
| Fabrizio Moggio | Telecom Italia Mobile | |
| Kevin Xu | 5GFF/Verizon Wireless | |
| Leo Chely | Cabellabs | |
| Deepak Gunjal | Cap Gemini | x |
| Babu Narayan | Nabstract | |
| Vaibhav Mehta | Nabstract | |
| Uwe Rauschenbach | Nokia | |
| Nicola Cadenelli | Nearby Computing | |
| Randy Levensalor | Cablelabs | |
| Tom Van Pelt | GSMA | x |
| Thomas Vits | EdgeXR | x |
| Kevin Smith (minutes, aka 'Kev') | 5GFF/Vodafone | x |
| Joshua Peng | JC Drawn Mobile | |
| Mourad Khanfouci | x | |
| Mark Cornall | GSMA | |
| Andrew Wajs | x | |
| Navdeep | DT | x |
| Uwe Rauschenbach | x |
Agenda
The project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF. |
- Roll Call
- Action Items Review
- Approval of minutes of last meeting
- Agenda Bashing
- General Topics
- Goal before MWC. Have an agreement on first version on LCM and Discovery APIs.
- Confirmed we do not require a v1.0 for MWC
- APIs should at least conform to CAMARA Commonalities and Identity & Consent management guidelines
- ACTION: Kev to send details of the linting script , Consent requirements and Test definitions for the LCM API
- Harmonization of concepts/items among Simple Edge Discovery/MVP/Traffic Influence
- Ref issue #163
- Discussion continued on the terminology and taxonomy (zones, sites, regions, availability zones etc.) and the relationship to application providers and end users
- The taxonomy should be conitnued in issue 163
- Clarification on the overall concept of Discovery and Edge to be started in the GitHub repo Discussions
- Important that whatever it is called we have an agreed/harmonised understanding of the terminology and taxonomy
- Agreed to work on a diagram with taxonomy proposals to supplement suggestions on terminology
- Continuation on discussion PR159 With User stories
- (Sergio Francisco Ortiz @Cristina please confirm outcome of this point#?}
- [Sergio] Pull request to be moved to discussions, and potentially include case of returning best existing app endpoint in a future version.
- (Sergio Francisco Ortiz @Cristina please confirm outcome of this point#?}
- Minor changes on MVP EdgeCloud_LcM after approval of (PR 154)
- Simple Edge Discovery will remain separate to LCM
- Cleaning status of auxiliary branches
- Kev confirmed these are now removed
- Goal before MWC. Have an agreement on first version on LCM and Discovery APIs.
- Any Other Topics
Minutes
Action Item Review
| Description | Due date | Assignee | Task appears on |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mahesh Chapalamadugu | 2024-06-11 EC Minutes |
Topic 1
- Comments